Former fusion scientist on why we won't have fusion power by 2040
What it is
A former fusion scientist argues why fusion power by 2040 is unrealistic, covering the physics challenges, neutron issues and optimistic company claims, with a brief note of good news.
Why Hacker News recommends it
Praised as the best crash course on fusion reactor design nuances from an insider, used to temper fusion hype.
- 1 people recommended it
- 2 different months
- 2 strong recommendations
- first 2021, last 2022
What HN commenters said
“I find it's the best crash course on the nuances of reactor design that I've seen.”
Best crash course on reactor design nuances from a fusion insider
willis936, 2021-09 · Strong recommendation · in “Fusion News Ignites Optimism”
Excerpts from Hacker News comments, linked to the originals. Summaries and labels were written by a language model from those comments.
Topics: fusion power, tokamak, neutrons, energy, reactor design
Also recommended by the same people
explainerWe Were Taught to Call Death a BlessingCGP Grey · 12 HN recommenders · 2018–2025
talkGDC 2018: John McDonald (Valve) - Using Deep Learning to Combat Cheating in CSGOmax4warn · 5 HN recommenders · 2018–2026
explainerExponential growth and epidemics3Blue1Brown · 10 HN recommenders · 2020–2020
explainerThe Unreasonable Efficiency of Black Holesminutephysics · 2 HN recommenders · 2020–2025
explainerThe Speed of Light is NOT About LightPBS Space Time · 8 HN recommenders · 2017–2023
explainerDon't Be the Last Person to DieCGP Grey · 4 HN recommenders · 2017–2025
demoOpen Source 8.5 Digit Voltmeter from CERN: Build and TestMarco Reps · 1 HN recommender · 2021–2025
lectureMIT's Pathway to Fusion Energy (IAP 2017) - Zach HartwigMIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center · 16 HN recommenders · 2017–2023